‘필연의 왕국’에서 ‘자유의 왕국’으로 ― 사상해방운동의 주체성 논리와 그 인식론적 한계
From ‘the Kingdom of Necessity’ to ‘the Kingdom of Freedom’: the Meanings and the Limits of Subject Theory in “Mind Emancipation Movement”
- 발행
- 2011 등록이 논문은 발행 시점을 확인하지 못해 원문 등록일을 적었습니다. KCI가 2005~2008년에 옛 논문을 몰아서 올린 탓에, 그 시기 등록분은 발행보다 평균 3~5년 늦습니다. 실제 발행연도는 더 이를 수 있습니다.
- 출처
- 국내 KCI
- UCI
- G704+INS000001718-ART001592229
- 원문
- 원문 보기 ↗
개념
키워드
subject theory, mind emancipation movement, criterion of truth, historical materialism, New Enlightenment, subject theory, mind emancipation movement, criterion of truth, historical materialism, New Enlightenment
초록
The word ‘mind emancipation’ was the representative word of Post-Mao era. After Cultural Revolution, for overcoming the faults of ultra-leftism in Cultural Revolution period, Reformers had to readjust Marxism-Leninism and Mao's thought. But that ‘readjustment’ did not mean total change or abandonment of all ideological principles of Socialism period, but those processes included both continuity and discontinuity. Especially the principle of ‘objective truth’ as historic principle and the principle of ‘sublation of contradictions’, the main principle of historical materialism, still remained as authoritative discourse. For example, the controversy on ‘the criterion of truth’ and ‘humanism’ and ‘alienation’ shows that the period of emancipation still in the realm of historical materialism. In terms of episteme, the most important subject theory in the era of reform, Li Zehou and Gao Ertai, also remained in the realm of historical materialism, and because of that, they just produced ‘limited subject’ which could not emerge from the principle of historial materialism. For describing their subject theories more concretely, we have to delve deeper into the inner logics of them.