쇠렌 키에르케고르와 에마뉘엘 레비나스의 윤리적 주체성에 대한 연구
A Comparative Study of Søren Kierkegaard’s and Emmanuel Levinas’s Ethical Subjectivity
- 발행
- 2009
- 소속·발행
- 남서울대학교
- 출처
- 국내 KCI
- UCI
- G704+INS000000917-ART001335512
- 원문등록
- 2009-04-14
- 원문
- 원문 보기 ↗
개념
키워드
에마뉘엘 레비나스, 쇠렌 키에르케고르, 윤리학, 주체성, 타자윤리, Emmanuel Levinas, Søren Kierkegaard, ethics, subjectivity, ethic of the other
초록
Kierkegaard rejects Hegel's philosophical system because subject of Hegel is too abstract to contain the concept of individual being. Kierkegaard's subject is based on religious and theological subject based on the relationship with God. On the other hand, Emmanuel Levinas asserts that subject can be understood in relation to the other. According to Levinas, a legitimate understanding of subject can be obtained by the face of the other, which is a trace of transcendental Other. Whereas Levinas argues that an authentic subjectivity is realized by the relationship with the other, Kierkegaard asserts that it is rooted in the relationship with God. For Kierkegaard, a God-relationship is the most important factor to motivate loving other(neighbors). Though Levinas and Kierkegaard agree that there is a threefold structure between the other and the subject, what they disagree is on the nature of the second ontological mediation. Kierkegaard insists that it is God who is always the middle term between me and my neighbor, while Levinas argues that it is always the neighbor who is the middle term between me and God. In this study, I will explore the similarities and differences between Levin