청소년 보호와 국가후견주의의 한계 - 헌재 2014. 4. 24. 2011헌마659등(병합), 청소년보호법 제23조의3 등 위헌확인의 평석을 중심으로 -
Youth Protection and Limit of State Paternalism - Focusing on Study on the Decision 2011Hun-Ma659of the Constitutional Court of Korea -
- 발행
- 2014 등록이 논문은 발행 시점을 확인하지 못해 원문 등록일을 적었습니다. KCI가 2005~2008년에 옛 논문을 몰아서 올린 탓에, 그 시기 등록분은 발행보다 평균 3~5년 늦습니다. 실제 발행연도는 더 이를 수 있습니다.
- 출처
- 국내 KCI
- 원문
- 원문 보기 ↗
개념
키워드
인터넷게임, 셧다운제, 청소년보호, 가족의 자율성, 후견주의, 국가후견주의, 문화국가, Internet Game, Shutdown System, Youth Protection, Family Autonomy, Paternalism, State Paternalism, Culture State
초록
The Constitutional Court of Korea(hereinafter ‘the Court’) held that so-called ‘Internet Game Shutdown System’ which bans providing Internet Game to youth under the age of 16 from a.m. 12 to a.m. 6 is not unconstitutional in 4. 24. 2014(2011Hun-Ma659). Conclusively, I think that the decision of the Court (hereinafter ‘the Decision’) lacks recognition that the Internet Game Shutdown System is based on a premodern way of thinking, administrative opportunism, and statism. Especially, the Decision lacks profound understanding on the meaning of family autonomy and the limits of state paternalism in youth protection.
 Particularly, the problems of the Decision of the Court are as follows.
 First, the Decision lacks awareness on youth as human rights subjects. The Decision premises youth as just objects to protect.
 Second, the Decision is short of understanding on the meaning of family autonomy in youth protection.
 Third, the Decision is short of consideration on the limit of state paternalism in youth protection.
 Fourth, the Decision lacks consideration on the limit of state’s role in culture sector in accordance with the principle of culture state.
 Fift