중국 생성형 인공지능 규제에 관한 고찰
A Study on China’s Generative AI Regulations
- 발행
- 2023 등록이 논문은 발행 시점을 확인하지 못해 원문 등록일을 적었습니다. KCI가 2005~2008년에 옛 논문을 몰아서 올린 탓에, 그 시기 등록분은 발행보다 평균 3~5년 늦습니다. 실제 발행연도는 더 이를 수 있습니다.
- 소속·발행
- 인하대학교
- 출처
- 국내 KCI
- DOI
- 10.34267/cbstl.2023.14.1.115
- 원문
- 원문 보기 ↗
개념
키워드
인공지능, 생성형 인공지능, 국가안보, 사이버안보, 국가경쟁력, Artificial Intelligence, generative AI, national security, cyber security, national competitiveness
초록
CAC on April 11 issued draft Measures to govern generative AI service provision in China. The draft Measures related to the regulation of generative AI. However, in terms of technical features(①data; ②algorithm; ③AIGC; ④forming public opinion), there are current laws and regulations(①Cybersecurity Law·Data Security Law·PIPL; ②Algorithm Regulation; ③Deepfake Regulation; ④Public Opinion Regulation).
 As abovementioned, China had a way to regulate generative. Nevertheless, the reason for rushing to enact the Measures is that generative AI has caused great social repercussions. China stipulates the protection of IP rights and personal information, and the prevention of monopoly of Big Tech to fill the legislative gap.
 A careful examination of the Measures reveals that the main purpose of enacting the Measures is not to resolve conflicts of rights. It focuses on strengthening national security in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Because, in the process of data processing using AI technology, information related to national security may be exposed, and users can make behaviors that threaten social order by distributing AIGC.
 In addition, China’s expert groups