코로나 루머의 사실검증 마크에 대한 반응 연구: 절반의 거짓과 절반의 사실은 다른가?
Response to the Fact-check Mark on Rumor: Half-False vs. Half-True?
- 발행
- 2022 등록KCI API에는 발행일 항목이 없어 원문 등록일을 쓰고 있습니다. 실측으로 발행보다 최대 6년 늦습니다 — 재수집하면 발행연월로 바뀝니다.
- 소속·발행
- 한동대학교
- 출처
- 국내 KCI
- DOI
- 10.15524/KSAS.2022.23.1.041
- 원문
- 원문 보기 ↗
개념
키워드
Rumor, Fact-check, Framing, Prior belief, Rumor, Fact-check, Framing, Prior belief
초록
Purpose: This study investigated the framing effects of fact-check mark on rumor believability, specifically when the fact-checking evaluations are inconclusive.
 Method: Using two rumors regarding COVID-19, an online experiment (Fact-checking mark: half-true vs. half-false vs. withheld) with 273 Korean adults was conducted.
 Result: The results showed that fact-checking mark framed as half-false reduced rumor believability, whereas that framed as half-true increased rumor believability. The rumor believability changes in the half-false condition was found to be greater than those in the withheld condition. Also, the exposure to inconclusive fact-checking marks increased the rumor believability of individuals who had lower levels of prior rumor beliefs and decreased the rumor believability of individuals who had higher levels of prior rumor beliefs.
 Conclusion: This study enhances our understanding of how fact-checking evaluations influence individuals’ rumor believability.