EU 및 일본 디지털플랫폼 규제 현황과 정책적 함의
Implications from Regulations on Digital Platforms in EU and Japan
- 발행
- 2022 등록KCI API에는 발행일 항목이 없어 원문 등록일을 쓰고 있습니다. 실측으로 발행보다 최대 6년 늦습니다 — 재수집하면 발행연월로 바뀝니다.
- 소속·발행
- 중앙대학교
- 출처
- 국내 KCI
- DOI
- 10.18397/kcgr.2021.25.4.51
- 원문
- 원문 보기 ↗
개념
키워드
디지털플랫폼, 온라인플랫폼, 양면시장, 디지털서비스법, 디지털시장법, 불법 콘텐츠, Digital Platform, Online Platform, Double-sided Market, Digital Services Act, Digital Markets Act, Illegal Contents
초록
(Purpose) The digital platform industry is a winner-take-all structure. It is due to the nature of the multi-sided market. The winner of the digital platform war maximizes profits by putting on various business models. It expands its business by inducing a powerful network effect. However, the harm caused by platform monopoly in the winner-take-all structure is very serious. This is the reason why a new market order and competition standards are needed in the era of platform economy. Order and standards are 'regulation' in other words. Platform regulation is already a global trend. The purpose of this paper is to review the regulatory methods of the EU and Japan to extract implications.
 (Design/methodology/approach) This article deals with Digital Services Act(DSA) in the EU. At the same time as introducing the outline or the recent discussion about DSA in the EU. And we would like to obtain implications through comparison with the recently enacted Digital Platform Regulation Act in Japan. This paper is differentiated in that it includes EU member states' views on DSA and comparisons between DSA and the Japanese Digital Platform Regulation Act. And we also examine the reasons