학문목적 한국어 학습자의 토론 수업 연구-학습자 간 유창성 평가를 중심으로-
A study on the debating class for the academic Korean learners –focusing on the fluency evaluation between learners-
- 발행
- 2021 등록KCI API에는 발행일 항목이 없어 원문 등록일을 쓰고 있습니다. 실측으로 발행보다 최대 6년 늦습니다 — 재수집하면 발행연월로 바뀝니다.
- 소속·발행
- 숙명여자대학교
- 출처
- 국내 KCI
- DOI
- 10.18842/klaces.2021.17.3.007
- 원문
- 원문 보기 ↗
개념
키워드
학문목적 한국어 학습자, 토론 수업, 말하기 유창성, 토론 유창성, 동료 평가, Korean Learner for Academic Purpose, Debating Class, Speaking Fluency, Discussion Fluency, Peer Evaluation
초록
This study aims to examine learners' perceptions through fluency evaluations among learners in academic-purpose Korean debating classes. For that, the discussion of 31 advanced learners was conducted fluency evaluations by fellow learners, and the debaters' utterances were transcribed and analyzed. The analysis results are as follows. First, regression analysis of factors that determine a debater's fluency shows that the variable that most influences the debater's fluency judgment is the frequency of use of the argument, and the proportion of non-fluent utterances is somewhat less influential than the frequency of use of the argument. Second, fellow learners judged debaters with low rates of non-fluent utterances to be linguistically fluent. This is different from previous research results that native language speakers judge foreign learners' speaking fluency by their speaking speed. Third, the factor that influenced the debater's judgment of content fluency was the frequency of use of the argument. Learners tend to perceive debaters who use arguments highly as fluent debaters. Fluent discussion speaking requires training for learners' ability to construct arguments, as in conventi