국내 기업의 개인정보 자기결정권 강화를 위한 논의: EU의 GDPR과 미국 캘리포니아주의 CCPA를 중심으로
A Case Study for Improvement of Users’ Right to Informational self-determination:Focusing on the GDPR of EU and the CCPA of California, USA
- 발행
- 2020 등록KCI API에는 발행일 항목이 없어 원문 등록일을 쓰고 있습니다. 실측으로 발행보다 최대 6년 늦습니다 — 재수집하면 발행연월로 바뀝니다.
- 소속·발행
- 전남대학교 전자상거래협동과정
- 출처
- 국내 KCI
- DOI
- 10.5859/KAIS.2019.28.4.65
- 원문
- 원문 보기 ↗
개념
키워드
GDPR, CCPA, Personal Information Protection Act, Right to Access, Right to Information Self-determination, Profiling, Behavioral Targeting, ‘My Data’ Policy, GDPR, CCPA, Personal Information Protection Act, Right to Access, Right to Information Self-determination, Profiling, Behavioral Targeting, ‘My Data’ Policy
초록
Purpose The purpose of this study is to find out in extent to which the companies in Korea and oversea, which has been subjected by different laws of their country, have guaranteed the personal information rights and have provided proper ‘right to access’ to the information subjects.
 
 
 Design/methodology/approach This study compared Korean laws with 'General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)' of EU and 'California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)' to check each of the level of 'right to access' guarantee. In terms of the difference in guaranteeing the right, this study compared Korean IT leading companies with US global leading IT companies to find out how much ‘right to access’ are properly implemented in their policies and functions they provide.
 
 
 Findings The result of the study shows that 'right to access' has not been well guaranteed by Korean law, as it does not provide the right to choose method and medium by information subjects and does not clarify the types of diverse information. This was clearly opposite with the other laws providing the right to choose what method and medium that subjects want with clarifying every types of personal info